login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
October
»
24
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Dmitry Torokhov
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - 8:33 pm
On Tuesday 23 October 2007, Ryan Lortie wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, 2007-23-10 at 14:10 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > No, rfkill want to see keypresses, period. It does not care if there > > are other applications also seeing the same keypresses, it just does > > not want keypresses stolen from it. > > Right. This is exactly the problem. The current grab API exists to > prevent keys from being delivered to normal users, but rfkill still > wants to see them. > > No matter how you slice it, if both of these desires are to be satisfied > then there needs to be some sort of a system to differentiate between > rfkill and "normal users". That's what the priority is here. >
And the solution is pretty simple - do not use grab. -- Dmitry -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Zephaniah E. Hull
, (Sat Jun 9, 1:48 am)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Mon Jun 11, 10:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Zephaniah E. Hull
, (Mon Jun 11, 10:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Mon Jun 11, 10:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Zephaniah E. Hull
, (Mon Jun 11, 10:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Mon Jun 11, 10:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Zephaniah E. Hull
, (Mon Jun 11, 10:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Vojtech Pavlik
, (Mon Jul 2, 8:20 am)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Zephaniah E. Hull
, (Tue Jul 3, 9:45 am)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Vojtech Pavlik
, (Tue Jul 3, 3:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Ryan Lortie
, (Fri Sep 28, 8:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Tue Oct 23, 6:21 am)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Ryan Lortie
, (Tue Oct 23, 8:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Tue Oct 23, 11:10 am)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Ryan Lortie
, (Tue Oct 23, 6:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Tue Oct 23, 8:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Zephaniah E. Hull
, (Wed Oct 24, 8:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Ryan Lortie
, (Wed Oct 24, 10:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Zephaniah E. Hull
, (Fri Oct 26, 9:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Ryan Lortie
, (Fri Oct 26, 10:16 am)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Fri Oct 26, 10:29 am)
Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
, Zephaniah E. Hull
, (Fri Oct 26, 10:58 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Dmitry Torokhov
Re: Clarifying platform_device_unregister
Theodore Tso
Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/3] Recursive mtime for ext3
Kevin Cernekee
[PATCH 7/7] MIPS: Fix regression on BCM4710 processor detection
Eric W. Biederman
Re: [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix for cpusets
Volker Sauer
Re: D-Link DFE-580TX and snmpd problems, who's maintainer of sundance.c ?
git
:
Jeff King
Re: [PATCH] git-name-rev: accept list of refs from user
Johan Herland
Re: Empty directories...
Brandon Casey
[PATCH v3] t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file
Steffen Prohaska
[PATCH] user-manual: mention git gui citool (commit, amend)
Krzysztof Halasa
Re: [PATCH] Change "refs/" references to symbolic constants
linux-netdev
:
Eric Dumazet
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx
Stephen Hemminger
Re: [PATCH] make TLLAO option for NA packets configurable
Eric Dumazet
[PATCH] net: fix rtable leak in net/ipv4/route.c
Ira Snyder
Re: [PATCH RFC v2] net: add PCINet driver
Stephen Hemminger
[PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v13)
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
nfsd race fixes: ext2
Linux Kernel Mailing List
m68knommu: MCF5307 PIT GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS support
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Remove the macro get_personality
Linux Kernel Mailing List
perf counters: add prctl interface to disable/enable counters
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Staging: rtl8192su: fix test for negative error in rtl8192_rx_isr()
openbsd-misc
:
Miod Vallat
Re: No Blob without Puffy
Henning Brauer
Re: Resilient RAID
Paul M
Re: WAY OT: Have you hugged your local OpenBSD dev lately?
Fred Crowson
Re: need help --reboot of newly installed OpenBSD 4.7 on Toshiba Libretto 70 neds...
E.T
Processeur Atom ?
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate