On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Jan Blunck wrote:My intention was to help speed up the Union Mount effort by ensuring that patches don't rot waiting for developer's attention. Going by the past interactions, I got a feeling that you have lot of other work besides this, while I have time to spare on this. Hence wanted to do my bit to get patches moving as quickly as possible. As I have conveyed to you many times, I would still like you to maintain the patches and send out as timely as possible on lkml. If you can't do this because of your other commitments, then I would more than willing to maintain these and give them maximum attention. And thanks for making available the patches publicly, I have been asking this for months now. Regards, Bharata. -
| H. Peter Anvin | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 008/196] Chinese: add translation of volatile-considered-harmful.txt |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Alex Chiang | [PATCH 1/4] Remove path attribute from sgi_hotplug |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU |
