login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
October
»
23
Re: [PATCH 6/12] KVM: work around SMP requirement
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <akpm@...>, <avi@...>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 6/12] KVM: work around SMP requirement
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - 6:46 pm
Adrian Bunk wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 06:36:40PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> KVM is currently completely broken for the !CONFIG_SMP case. >> >> drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c: In function ‘kvm_flush_remote_tlbs’: >> drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c:220: error: implicit declaration of function ‘smp_call_function_mask’ >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com> >> --- >> I hope the KVM maintainer can come up with a better solution... >> >> diff --git a/drivers/kvm/Kconfig b/drivers/kvm/Kconfig >> index 8749fa4..e35fbc6 100644 >> --- a/drivers/kvm/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/kvm/Kconfig >> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ if VIRTUALIZATION >> >> config KVM >> tristate "Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) support" >> - depends on X86 && EXPERIMENTAL >> + depends on X86 && EXPERIMENTAL && SMP >> ... > > Assuming it won't get fixed soon, the pattern would be "(SMP || BROKEN)". > > The effect is the same, but this makes it more obvious that KVM > does not depend architecturally on SMP but just broken. > > Of course, the preferred solution is to simply get KVM fixed...
In general I agree, but I specifically avoided CONFIG_BROKEN in case it was an intentional choice to require an SMP kernel. Jeff -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 6/12] KVM: work around SMP requirement
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Oct 23, 6:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/12] KVM: work around SMP requirement
, Adrian Bunk
, (Tue Oct 23, 6:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/12] KVM: work around SMP requirement
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Oct 23, 6:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/12] KVM: work around SMP requirement
, Avi Kivity
, (Wed Oct 24, 4:36 am)
[patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed Oct 24, 8:32 am)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed Oct 24, 8:36 am)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed Oct 24, 2:11 pm)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error
, Randy Dunlap
, (Wed Oct 31, 11:34 pm)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error
, Ingo Molnar
, (Thu Nov 1, 4:31 am)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error
, Avi Kivity
, (Thu Nov 1, 9:10 am)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error
, Ingo Molnar
, (Thu Nov 1, 10:59 am)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error
, Avi Kivity
, (Thu Nov 1, 5:16 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Max Krasnyansky
Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime us...
Jeremy Allison
Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
Randy Dunlap
Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 (pcmcia)
Damien Wyart
ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Josip Rodin
Re: bnx2_poll panicking kernel
Linus Torvalds
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Denys Fedoryshchenko
thousands of classes, e1000 TX unit hang
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
6 users
and
918 guests
online.
Online users
strcmp
makemoneywithg
mats28nicu
jakecapri
bedandbreakfas
backlinkservchp
Syndicate