Re: [PATCH 6/12] KVM: work around SMP requirement

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - 3:46 pm

Adrian Bunk wrote:

In general I agree, but I specifically avoided CONFIG_BROKEN in case it 
was an intentional choice to require an SMP kernel.

	Jeff


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 6/12] KVM: work around SMP requirement, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Oct 23, 3:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/12] KVM: work around SMP requirement, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Oct 23, 3:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/12] KVM: work around SMP requirement, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Oct 23, 3:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/12] KVM: work around SMP requirement, Avi Kivity, (Wed Oct 24, 1:36 am)
[patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Oct 24, 5:32 am)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Oct 24, 5:36 am)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Oct 24, 11:11 am)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Oct 31, 8:34 pm)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Nov 1, 1:31 am)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error, Avi Kivity, (Thu Nov 1, 6:10 am)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Nov 1, 7:59 am)
Re: [patch] kvm: fix !SMP build error, Avi Kivity, (Thu Nov 1, 2:16 pm)