Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - 8:44 am

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:


earlier gcc versions had problems with -mregparm and with -pg. I just 
did a quick test with latest gcc and at a quick glance it seems to work 
better - i'll propagate that throught he whole latency tracer to see 
whether it's indeed working throughout. Anyway, this means that there's 
no urgent need for this patch and we've dropped it from the x86 queue 
for now. As long as it only affects older gcc's it's probably not worth 
force-keeping the annotations for that purpose alone.

	Ingo
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final., Rob Landley, (Thu Oct 11, 3:54 pm)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Robert P. J. Day, (Mon Oct 22, 12:01 am)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Robert P. J. Day, (Mon Oct 22, 12:58 am)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 22, 4:14 pm)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 22, 4:26 pm)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 22, 4:56 pm)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Oct 23, 7:20 am)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Oct 23, 7:31 am)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Oct 23, 8:44 am)