Re: [PATCH -v2 4/7] RT overloaded runqueues accounting

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paul Jackson
Date: Monday, October 22, 2007 - 11:19 pm

Paul M wrote:

Good - could you comment task_cs() with this explanation?

The rules are derived from the cpuset rules, as you explain,
and as I suspected, but now task_cs() is the most popular
way to access a tasks cpuset from code within kernel/cpuset.c,
and that's code you added.

The reason that I started this subthread is that I didn't see
any immediate evidence that the RT code was honoring this locking,
and I suspected that I clear comment over task_cs() could have
clarified that for them.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH -v2 4/7] RT overloaded runqueues accounting, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Oct 22, 7:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH -v2 4/7] RT overloaded runqueues accounting, Paul Jackson, (Mon Oct 22, 9:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH -v2 4/7] RT overloaded runqueues accounting, Paul Menage, (Mon Oct 22, 11:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH -v2 4/7] RT overloaded runqueues accounting, Paul Jackson, (Mon Oct 22, 11:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH -v2 4/7] RT overloaded runqueues accounting, Steven Rostedt, (Tue Oct 23, 6:43 am)
Re: [PATCH -v2 4/7] RT overloaded runqueues accounting, Paul Jackson, (Tue Oct 23, 2:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH -v2 4/7] RT overloaded runqueues accounting, Paul Jackson, (Tue Jan 29, 6:00 am)