On 10/22/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
quoted text
>
> I think we also need the notion of load, like we have in cpu_acct.c

Yes, a notion of load would be good - but the "load" calculated by
cpu_acct.c isn't all that useful yet - it's just a total of the CPU
cycles used in the 10 second time interval prior to the current
interval. Something that's more analagous to the real machine load
would be nice, and I hope the numbers could be made available via CFS.

quoted text
> Don't we need to do a css_get() on the cgrp to ensure that the cgroup
> does not go away if it's empty and someone does an rmdir on it?

See my other email. Yes, I think we need more here, but probably
something more generic.

Paul
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/