Re: LSM conversion to static interface

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Crispin Cowan <crispin@...>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...>, Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Alan Cox <alan@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, LSM ML <linux-security-module@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - 1:32 am

On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Crispin Cowan wrote:

one reason to not be willing to rebuild the kernel is that they may rely 
on a module from a different third party that is shipped/tested for the 
specific pre-compiled kernels from the distro.

David Lang
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Thomas Fricaccia, (Mon Oct 22, 1:00 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Giacomo Catenazzi, (Tue Oct 23, 1:53 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Crispin Cowan, (Tue Oct 23, 3:12 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Greg KH, (Tue Oct 23, 11:41 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Giacomo A. Catenazzi, (Tue Oct 23, 4:17 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Greg KH, (Mon Oct 22, 1:13 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Simon Arlott, (Tue Oct 23, 7:38 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Crispin Cowan, (Tue Oct 23, 1:14 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, , (Tue Oct 23, 1:32 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Alan Cox, (Mon Oct 22, 1:12 pm)