usb_hcd_flush_endpoint() has a retry loop that starts with a spin_lock_irq(), but only gives up the spinlock, not the irq_disable before jumping to the rescan label. Split the spin_lock_irq into the retryable part and the local_irq_disable() that is only done once as a micro-optimization and slight cleanup. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- On Tuesday 23 October 2007, I wrote:One more such example that was not found by lockdep. I guess this counts as a false positive, as it is clearly harmless, but working around it is a small optimization for the case where local_irq_disable() is a hypervisor call. Should we try to fix this class of (non-)problem in other places? Will this patch cause a different warning with lockdep since now we are pairing spin_lock() with spin_unlock_irq()? --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c @@ -1312,8 +1312,9 @@ void usb_hcd_flush_endpoint(struct usb_device *udev, hcd = bus_to_hcd(udev->bus); /* No more submits can occur */ + local_irq_disable(); rescan: - spin_lock_irq(&hcd_urb_list_lock); + spin_lock(&hcd_urb_list_lock); list_for_each_entry (urb, &ep->urb_list, urb_list) { int is_in; -
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #11210] libata badness |
| Andrea Arcangeli | [PATCH 00 of 11] mmu notifier #v16 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Daniel Eischen | Re: error with thread |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
