Re: LSM conversion to static interface

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Greg KH
Date: Monday, October 22, 2007 - 9:56 am

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:50:43PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

Wait, we aren't talking about dropping LSM at all, just the "LSM is a
module" option.  That's it.  And by making LSM not a module, we can then
go on to fix some of the reported speed issues that are present with the
LSM option enabled right now.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Thomas Fricaccia, (Sun Oct 21, 7:24 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Greg KH, (Sun Oct 21, 8:59 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Alan Cox, (Mon Oct 22, 3:07 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Crispin Cowan, (Mon Oct 22, 9:10 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Alan Cox, (Mon Oct 22, 9:50 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Greg KH, (Mon Oct 22, 9:56 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Avi Kivity, (Mon Oct 22, 10:47 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Oct 23, 9:05 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Tue Oct 23, 9:52 am)