Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rik van Riel
Date: Monday, October 22, 2007 - 8:19 am

On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:30:00 +0300
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:

*blink*

I guess people who disable CONFIG_BUG really choose to shoot themselves
in the foot when something bad happens.  The kernel is full of error
paths where the current thread really should not be continuing.

Oh well...

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] return hidden bug, Roel Kluin, (Sun Oct 21, 6:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Rik van Riel, (Sun Oct 21, 6:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Roel Kluin, (Sun Oct 21, 6:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Rik van Riel, (Sun Oct 21, 8:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Herbert Xu, (Sun Oct 21, 10:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Pekka Enberg, (Mon Oct 22, 2:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Rik van Riel, (Mon Oct 22, 8:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Pekka Enberg, (Mon Oct 22, 8:23 am)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Ray Lee, (Mon Oct 22, 9:42 am)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Roel Kluin, (Mon Oct 22, 10:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Ray Lee, (Mon Oct 22, 11:12 am)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Matt Mackall, (Mon Oct 22, 11:36 am)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Roel Kluin, (Mon Oct 22, 11:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Rene Herman, (Mon Oct 22, 3:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Ray Lee, (Mon Oct 22, 4:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug, Rene Herman, (Mon Oct 22, 5:15 pm)