* Dave Johnson <djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com> wrote:

quoted text
> The previous patch wasn't correctly handling the 'count' variable.  If 
> a CPU gave bad results on the 1st or 2nd run but good results on the 
> 3rd, it wouldn't do the correct thing.  No idea if any such CPU 
> exists, but the patch below handles that case by discarding the bad 
> runs.
> 
> If a bad result (too quick, or too slow) occurs on any of the 3 runs 
> it will be discarded.
> 
> Also updated some comments to explain what's going on.

thanks - applied in addition to your previous patch.

	Ingo
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/