Re: sata sil3114 vs. certain seagate drives results in filesystem corruptions

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Bernd Schubert
Date: Monday, October 22, 2007 - 3:59 am

On Monday 22 October 2007 12:36:32 Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:

Yeah, pity it did not fix it :( I will try to port Tejuns patch 
(http://home-tj.org/wiki/index.php/Sil_m15w#Patches) to 2.6.23 today or 
tomorrow. If you are testing anyway, could you then also try this?


Yes, all pci-slots are free and the systems to have between 4 and 16GB memory 
(ecc, monitored with edac). Well, those are cluster systems (actually tyan 
names those B2882).
Do you think the configuration is related? Here it also happens with odirect, 
we tested this to minimize memory effects.


Cheers,
Bernd


-- 
Bernd Schubert
Q-Leap Networks GmbH
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
sata sil3114 vs. certain seagate drives results in filesys ..., Soeren Sonnenburg, (Fri Oct 19, 11:55 pm)
Re: sata sil3114 vs. certain seagate drives results in fil ..., Soeren Sonnenburg, (Sun Oct 21, 10:56 pm)
Re: sata sil3114 vs. certain seagate drives results in fil ..., Soeren Sonnenburg, (Mon Oct 22, 3:36 am)
Re: sata sil3114 vs. certain seagate drives results in fil ..., Bernd Schubert, (Mon Oct 22, 3:59 am)
Re: sata sil3114 vs. certain seagate drives results in fil ..., Soeren Sonnenburg, (Mon Oct 22, 5:56 am)
Re: sata sil3114 vs. certain seagate drives results in fil ..., Soeren Sonnenburg, (Mon Oct 22, 11:57 pm)