Re: LSM conversion to static interface

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alan Cox
Date: Monday, October 22, 2007 - 3:07 am

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:24:42 -0700
"Thomas Fricaccia" <thomas_fricacci@yahoo.com> wrote:


Crispin at least is providing genuine discussion points. Sarbox has
nothing to say on "using vendor linux kernels".

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Thomas Fricaccia, (Sun Oct 21, 7:24 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Greg KH, (Sun Oct 21, 8:59 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Alan Cox, (Mon Oct 22, 3:07 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Crispin Cowan, (Mon Oct 22, 9:10 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Alan Cox, (Mon Oct 22, 9:50 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Greg KH, (Mon Oct 22, 9:56 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Avi Kivity, (Mon Oct 22, 10:47 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Oct 23, 9:05 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Tue Oct 23, 9:52 am)