login
Header Space

 
 

Re: LSM conversion to static interface

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@...>
Cc: Crispin Cowan <crispin@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, LSM ML <linux-security-module@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2007 - 6:07 am

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:24:42 -0700
"Thomas Fricaccia" <thomas_fricacci@yahoo.com> wrote:


Crispin at least is providing genuine discussion points. Sarbox has
nothing to say on "using vendor linux kernels".

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Thomas Fricaccia, (Sun Oct 21, 10:24 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Alan Cox, (Mon Oct 22, 6:07 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Crispin Cowan, (Mon Oct 22, 12:10 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Alan Cox, (Mon Oct 22, 12:50 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Greg KH, (Mon Oct 22, 12:56 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Greg KH, (Sun Oct 21, 11:59 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Tue Oct 23, 12:52 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Avi Kivity, (Mon Oct 22, 1:47 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Oct 23, 12:05 pm)
speck-geostationary