Re: forcing write-back from FS - again

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2007 - 5:55 am

On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:38:48 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@yandex.ru> wrote:


take a look at struct writeback_control:

        unsigned nonblocking:1;         /* Don't get stuck on request queues */
        unsigned encountered_congestion:1; /* An output: a queue is full */
        unsigned for_kupdate:1;         /* A kupdate writeback */
        unsigned for_reclaim:1;         /* Invoked from the page allocator */
        unsigned for_writepages:1;      /* This is a writepages() call */
        unsigned range_cyclic:1;        /* range_start is cyclic */
        unsigned more_io:1;             /* more io to be dispatched */

Add another one...
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
forcing write-back from FS - again, Artem Bityutskiy, (Sun Oct 21, 4:19 pm)
Re: forcing write-back from FS - again, Andrew Morton, (Sun Oct 21, 4:55 pm)
Re: forcing write-back from FS - again, Artem Bityutskiy, (Mon Oct 22, 4:52 am)
Re: forcing write-back from FS - again, Andrew Morton, (Mon Oct 22, 5:05 am)
Re: forcing write-back from FS - again, Artem Bityutskiy, (Mon Oct 22, 5:38 am)
Re: forcing write-back from FS - again, Andrew Morton, (Mon Oct 22, 5:55 am)
Re: forcing write-back from FS - again, Artem Bityutskiy, (Mon Oct 22, 6:04 am)