login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
October
»
22
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
Date: Monday, October 22, 2007 - 5:27 am
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
quoted text
> > but what bothers me even more is the large picture. Linux's > > development is still fundamentally skewed towards bandwidth (which > > goes up with hardware advances anyway), while the focus on latencies > > is very lacking (which users do care about much more and which > > usually does _not_ improve with improved hardware), so i cannot see > > why we shouldnt apply this. Reminds me of the illogical, almost > > superstitious resistence against the relatime patch. (which is not > > in 2.6.24 mind you - killed for good) > > Try `mount -o relatime' and prepare to be surprised ;)
i mean this one:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/relatime-patches/improve-relatime.patch
this actually makes relatime practical. Ingo -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Mon Oct 15, 1:46 pm)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Oct 15, 2:47 pm)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
, Rik van Riel
, (Mon Oct 15, 4:13 pm)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Oct 15, 5:12 pm)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
, Jens Axboe
, (Mon Oct 15, 3:28 pm)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Oct 22, 5:10 am)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Oct 22, 5:23 am)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Oct 22, 5:40 am)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Oct 22, 5:49 am)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Oct 22, 5:27 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
David Woodhouse
Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin"
Marcin Ślusarz
Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time
Avi Kivity
[PATCH 08/54] KVM: Portability: Move unalias_gfn to arch dependent file
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Evgeniy Polyakov
POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performance.
Antonio Almeida
HTB accuracy for high speed
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
3 users
and
772 guests
online.
Online users
cleanairexpert4
tiendadevideo
AustinDan
Syndicate