Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Nix
Date: Sunday, October 21, 2007 - 11:42 pm

On 22 Oct 2007, WANG Cong uttered the following:

It's hard to tell without LOCALE=C, but those are the sorts of results
I'd expect if you had run make {old,menu,x}config without specifying
ARCH=um, so you've configured for one architecture and are now trying
to build another.

Where is the include/asm symlink pointing to in your build tree?

(FWIW I get a coredump if I try to use the skas patch, but with noprocmm
UML in 2.6.23.1 builds and runs perfectly well on x86-32. I haven't
tried 2.6.23, but I see no reason why it should act any differently.)

-- 
`Some people don't think performance issues are "real bugs", and I think 
such people shouldn't be allowed to program.' --- Linus Torvalds
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final., Rob Landley, (Thu Oct 11, 3:54 pm)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Nix, (Sun Oct 21, 11:42 pm)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Robert P. J. Day, (Mon Oct 22, 12:01 am)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Robert P. J. Day, (Mon Oct 22, 12:58 am)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 22, 4:14 pm)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 22, 4:26 pm)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 22, 4:56 pm)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Oct 23, 7:20 am)
Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6 ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Oct 23, 7:31 am)