On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
quoted text > dean gaudet wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Yes, as Dave said, vmap (more specifically: vunmap) is very expensive
> >> because it generally has to invalidate TLBs on all CPUs.
> >>
> >
> > why is that? ignoring 32-bit archs we have heaps of address space
> > available... couldn't the kernel just burn address space and delay global
> > TLB invalidate by some relatively long time (say 1 second)?
> >
>
> Yes, that's precisely the problem. xfs does delay the unmap, leaving
> stray mappings, which upsets Xen.
sounds like a bug in xen to me :)
-dean
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings , dean gaudet , (Mon Oct 22, 12:28 am)