Re: Why are ipmi modules being loaded?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Dave Jones
Date: Sunday, October 21, 2007 - 1:09 pm

On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 03:34:11PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
 
 > AFAICT from modules.pcimap, ipmi_si should only be loaded for PCI ID 
 > [103c:121a] (which I don't have), or for devices with class c0700 (which I 
 > also don't have).

Hmm, is lspci truncating the class code?

 > 01:00.4 Serial bus controller [0c07]: Intel Corporation 82573E KCS (Active Management) [8086:108e] (rev 03)

Because this smells like an IPMI-ish device.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Why are ipmi modules being loaded?, Frans Pop, (Sun Oct 21, 6:34 am)
Re: Why are ipmi modules being loaded?, Dave Jones, (Sun Oct 21, 1:09 pm)
Re: Why are ipmi modules being loaded?, Frans Pop, (Sun Oct 21, 2:04 pm)
Re: Why are ipmi modules being loaded?, Martin Mares, (Sun Oct 21, 2:58 pm)
Re: Why are ipmi modules being loaded?, Andreas Schwab, (Sun Oct 21, 4:39 pm)