Re: [PATCH 00/11] KVM updates for Linux 2.6.24-rc review

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...>
Cc: <kvm-devel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, October 21, 2007 - 7:53 am

Avi Kivity a écrit :

What kind of comment do you want ?
What are the requirements to go in 2.6.24 instead of 2.6.25 ?

Is a bug correction enough ? :-P

This patch correct a bad behavior of x86_emulate_insn() in case of error with a 
REP prefix.

This patch is needed because, without it, when REP prefix is used with an 
instruction failing for some reasons (like IO or page fault) we don't restore 
all modified registers (like RSI and RDI), but only ECX and EIP, so when we 
re-enter in x86_emulate_insn() we modify again an already modified value. 
Moreover, this patch manages correctly the case where the instruction fails in 
writeback().




-- 
---------------- Laurent.Vivier@bull.net  -----------------
"Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow" E. S. Raymond

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 00/11] KVM updates for Linux 2.6.24-rc review, Avi Kivity, (Sun Oct 21, 7:08 am)
Re: [PATCH 00/11] KVM updates for Linux 2.6.24-rc review, Laurent Vivier, (Sun Oct 21, 7:53 am)