Don't dereference "data" when we know for sure it's NULL.

Spotted by the Coverity checker.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>

---
66bec2ef5c6d55fc30ef6ac5bb97fdfcfaf394f2 
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c
index c462824..e14ce3d 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static void ibmpex_register_bmc(int iface, struct device *dev)
 	data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!data) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR DRVNAME ": Insufficient memory for BMC "
-		       "interface %d.\n", data->interface);
+		       "interface.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 

-

[ message continues ]

Hrm but what data->interface would be is specified by the iface
parameter? Just spit that out instead?

Thanks,
Nish
-

[ message continues ]

This is only a symptom of the problem that kzalloc() failed, and when 
you are getting into such a situation here you have bigger problems - 
and these are not related to this driver.

Feel free to send a different patch, but IMHO "Insufficient memory" 

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-

[ message continues ]

As a side note, dev_err() should be used instead of printk here, and
possibly in other places. Darrick, could you please send a patch fixing
this?

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
-

[ message continues ]

Clean up printk use in ibmpex to use dev_err/dev_info macros and reword
some of the messages to be a bit more clear.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
---

 drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c
index c462824..3c8278b 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c
@@ -140,10 +140,10 @@ static int ibmpex_send_message(struct ibmpex_bmc_data *data)
 
 	return 0;
 out1:
-	printk(KERN_ERR "%s: request_settime=%x\n", __FUNCTION__, err);
+	dev_err(data->bmc_device, "request_settime=%x\n", err);
 	return err;
 out:
-	printk(KERN_ERR "%s: validate_addr=%x\n", __FUNCTION__, err);
+	dev_err(data->bmc_device, "validate_addr=%x\n", err);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -161,14 +161,14 @@ static int ibmpex_ver_check(struct ibmpex_bmc_data *data)
 	data->sensor_major = data->rx_msg_data[0];
 	data->sensor_minor = data->rx_msg_data[1];
 
-	printk(KERN_INFO DRVNAME ": Found BMC with sensor interface "
-	       "v%d.%d %d-%02d-%02d on interface %d\n",
-	       data->sensor_major,
-	       data->sensor_minor,
-	       extract_value(data->rx_msg_data, 2),
-	       data->rx_msg_data[4],
-	       data->rx_msg_data[5],
-	       data->interface);
+	dev_info(data->bmc_device, "Found BMC with sensor interface "
+		 "v%d.%d %d-%02d-%02d on interface %d\n",
+		 data->sensor_major,
+		 data->sensor_minor,
+		 extract_value(data->rx_msg_data, 2),
+		 data->rx_msg_data[4],
+		 data->rx_msg_data[5],
+		 data->interface);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ static int ibmpex_query_sensor_data(struct ibmpex_bmc_data *data, int sensor)
 	wait_for_completion(&data->read_complete);
 
 	if (data->rx_result || data->rx_msg_len < 26) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading sensor %d, please check.\n",
-		       sensor);
+		dev_err(data->bmc_device, "Error reading sensor %d.\n",
+			sensor);
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
 ...
[ message continues ]

Hi Darrick,


This message might be misleading, as there are other reasons why

Other than that, the patch looks OK:

Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>

-- 
Jean Delvare
-

[ message continues ]

Ok, I'll change the message to be a bit more accurate.
---
Clean up printk use in ibmpex.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
---

 drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c
index c462824..9c9cdb0 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c
@@ -140,10 +140,10 @@ static int ibmpex_send_message(struct ibmpex_bmc_data *data)
 
 	return 0;
 out1:
-	printk(KERN_ERR "%s: request_settime=%x\n", __FUNCTION__, err);
+	dev_err(data->bmc_device, "request_settime=%x\n", err);
 	return err;
 out:
-	printk(KERN_ERR "%s: validate_addr=%x\n", __FUNCTION__, err);
+	dev_err(data->bmc_device, "validate_addr=%x\n", err);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -161,14 +161,14 @@ static int ibmpex_ver_check(struct ibmpex_bmc_data *data)
 	data->sensor_major = data->rx_msg_data[0];
 	data->sensor_minor = data->rx_msg_data[1];
 
-	printk(KERN_INFO DRVNAME ": Found BMC with sensor interface "
-	       "v%d.%d %d-%02d-%02d on interface %d\n",
-	       data->sensor_major,
-	       data->sensor_minor,
-	       extract_value(data->rx_msg_data, 2),
-	       data->rx_msg_data[4],
-	       data->rx_msg_data[5],
-	       data->interface);
+	dev_info(data->bmc_device, "Found BMC with sensor interface "
+		 "v%d.%d %d-%02d-%02d on interface %d\n",
+		 data->sensor_major,
+		 data->sensor_minor,
+		 extract_value(data->rx_msg_data, 2),
+		 data->rx_msg_data[4],
+		 data->rx_msg_data[5],
+		 data->interface);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ static int ibmpex_query_sensor_data(struct ibmpex_bmc_data *data, int sensor)
 	wait_for_completion(&data->read_complete);
 
 	if (data->rx_result || data->rx_msg_len < 26) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading sensor %d, please check.\n",
-		       sensor);
+		dev_err(data->bmc_device, "Error reading sensor %d.\n",
+			sensor);
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
 
@@ -456,8 +456,7 @@ ...
[ message continues ]

-- 
Jean Delvare
-

[ message continues ]

Hi:


Applied to hwmon-2.6.git/testing, thanks.

-- 
Mark M. Hoffman
mhoffman@lightlink.com

-

[ message continues ]

ACK.

--D
-

[ message continues ]

Hi:


Applied to hwmon-2.6.git/testing, thanks.

-- 
Mark M. Hoffman
mhoffman@lightlink.com

-

[ message continues ]