Re: [PATCH 9/9] RT: Only dirty a cacheline if the priority is actually changing

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Roel Kluin
Date: Friday, October 19, 2007 - 7:48 pm

Gregory Haskins wrote:

I think you wanted a patch here?
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/9] RT: RT-Overload/Sched enhancements v4, Gregory Haskins, (Wed Oct 17, 11:50 am)
[PATCH 1/9] RT: push-rt, Gregory Haskins, (Wed Oct 17, 11:50 am)
[PATCH 2/9] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication, Gregory Haskins, (Wed Oct 17, 11:50 am)
[PATCH 3/9] RT: Wrap the RQ notion of priority to make it ..., Gregory Haskins, (Wed Oct 17, 11:50 am)
[PATCH 4/9] RT: Initialize the priority value, Gregory Haskins, (Wed Oct 17, 11:50 am)
[PATCH 5/9] RT: Maintain the highest RQ priority, Gregory Haskins, (Wed Oct 17, 11:50 am)
[PATCH 6/9] RT: Clean up some of the push-rt logic, Gregory Haskins, (Wed Oct 17, 11:50 am)
[PATCH 8/9] RT: Fixes for push-rt patch, Gregory Haskins, (Wed Oct 17, 11:51 am)
[PATCH 9/9] RT: Only dirty a cacheline if the priority is ..., Gregory Haskins, (Wed Oct 17, 11:51 am)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] RT: Only dirty a cacheline if the priority ..., Roel Kluin, (Fri Oct 19, 7:48 pm)