Re: [patch] sched: fix sched-domains partitioning by cpusets

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Paul Jackson <pj@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <akpm@...>, <menage@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <dino@...>, <cpw@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 2, 2007 - 1:29 pm

On Wednesday 03 October 2007 19:39, Paul Jackson wrote:

OK look, I don't want to hold up progress. I do like to ask these questions
and be difficult if I think there might be a better way and/or to make sure
you've thought about all the angles. I'm not volunteering to maintain
cpusets and I'm not as close to the customers who care as you.

Obviously what your patches do here is a lot closer to "the right thing"
than cpus_exclusive. And the worst problem they'll cause is to add
cruft to cpusets.c.

So I'll keep persuing the other subthread for the same reasons, but aside
from implementation nits, I don't know if it is worth holding up a merge.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch] sched: fix sched-domains partitioning by cpusets, Nick Piggin, (Tue Oct 2, 1:29 pm)
[PATCH] cpuset decrustify update and validate masks, Paul Jackson, (Sun Sep 30, 6:44 am)