Thanks for the review, Randy. Good comments.Yup - I should have written this line as: Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> It makes no difference to the code generated. I tend to leave out 'compiler optimization' hint words if I don't need them to get the compiler to optimize. In this case, of a single use file static routine, the compiler inlines anyway. You're right - and Andrew would be right as well, since the form: q = csa = doms = NULL; generates a compiler warning, as not all three pointers are the same type. So three lines of code it must be. Yup - you're right - about the 'csa' check. However the if(q ...) check is needed, because I have another bug here. I allocated 'q' using kfifo_alloc(), so must free using kfifo_free (or else leak the kfifo buffer memory.) Calls to kfifo_free() have to guard against NULL pointers before the call. Thanks, Randy! -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 -
| Alexandre Oliva | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: [net-2.6.24][patch 2/2] Dynamically allocate the loopback device |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Michael Riepe | Re: 2.6.27.19 + 28.7: network timeouts for r8169 and 8139too |
