On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 13:21 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:That's 2.6.24 ... and that's not what I said. I said I wanted to take it via scsi-misc into 2.6.24 and then take it via the stable tree for 2.6.23.x Sure, I'll state my case: This is a bug, but it has no affected users, nor will it because the aic94xx doesn't work on non-x86 architectures by reason of other longstanding bugs (and TODEVICE/FROMDEVICE only matters to architecures which use dma_map_sg to program the IOMMU). Given that we're at -rc9 and counting every patch towards stabilisation, I see no benefit to adding this to the tree because the benefit to users is zero and the detriment from code churn at this stage is potentially non-zero. My recommendation is still to follow what I propose: take it via scsi-misc to 2.6.24-rc1 and then back to 2.5.23.x James -
| Jeremy Allison | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Joerg Roedel | [PATCH 03/34] AMD IOMMU: add defines and structures for ACPI scanning code |
| Eric W. Biederman | [PATCH] powerpc pseries eeh: Convert to kthread API |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
