Re: [TOMOYO 04/15](repost) Utility functions and securityfs interface for policy manipulation.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, <chrisw@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 2, 2007 - 4:05 am

On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 04:31:48PM +0900, Kentaro Takeda wrote:
This seems like a bit of an abuse of sysfs. Isn't this precisely what
configfs is for?
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[TOMOYO 14/15](repost) LSM expansion for TOMOYO Linux., Kentaro Takeda, (Tue Oct 2, 3:39 am)
[TOMOYO 13/15](repost) Conditional permission support., Kentaro Takeda, (Tue Oct 2, 3:39 am)
[TOMOYO 12/15](repost) LSM adapter for TOMOYO., Kentaro Takeda, (Tue Oct 2, 3:38 am)
[TOMOYO 08/15](repost) Argv[0] access control functions., Kentaro Takeda, (Tue Oct 2, 3:35 am)
[TOMOYO 07/15](repost) File access control functions., Kentaro Takeda, (Tue Oct 2, 3:34 am)
[TOMOYO 06/15](repost) Auditing interface., Kentaro Takeda, (Tue Oct 2, 3:33 am)
Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functio..., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / , (Wed Oct 3, 7:43 am)
Sleeping in RCU list traversal, Tetsuo Handa, (Sun Oct 7, 6:38 am)
Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functio..., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / , (Wed Oct 3, 10:32 am)
Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functio..., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / , (Wed Oct 3, 9:11 am)
Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functio..., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / , (Tue Oct 2, 9:00 am)
Re: [TOMOYO 04/15](repost) Utility functions and securityfs ..., Paul Mundt, (Tue Oct 2, 4:05 am)