Re: [PATCH RFC] paravirt: cleanup lazy mode handling

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>
Cc: Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Andi Kleen <ak@...>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@...>, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...>, Nakajima, Jun <jun.nakajima@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 2, 2007 - 1:48 am

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

The code doesn't support having both lazy modes active at once.  Maybe 
that's not an issue, but aren't the two modes orthogonal?


This snippet looks like it wants to support concurrently active lazy modes.

-- 
Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature.

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH RFC] paravirt: cleanup lazy mode handling, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 1, 7:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC] paravirt: cleanup lazy mode handling, Avi Kivity, (Tue Oct 2, 1:48 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] paravirt: cleanup lazy mode handling, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Oct 2, 2:24 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] paravirt: cleanup lazy mode handling, Rusty Russell, (Mon Oct 1, 9:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC] paravirt: cleanup lazy mode handling, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Oct 2, 2:29 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] paravirt: cleanup lazy mode handling, Rusty Russell, (Tue Oct 2, 3:53 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] paravirt: cleanup lazy mode handling, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Oct 2, 6:43 pm)