login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPICA: hw: Don't carry spinlock over suspend

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, <linux-api@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 2, 2007 - 12:07 am

> On Sunday, 30 September 2007 20:39, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
ed

As someone who *has* been bitten by this bug - by all means.

I'd like to emphasize one more point - we were able to debug it only becaus=
e=20
old kernel at least displayed debug messages. Current kernel deadlocks=20
absolutely dead (pun intended). No output to console, no indication what=20
happens. I consider this regression. If at all possible, we should make sur=
e=20
that console output is available as early as possible.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPICA: hw: Don't carry spinlock over suspend, Andrey Borzenkov, (Tue Oct 2, 12:07 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPICA: hw: Don't carry spinlock over suspend, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Oct 2, 11:59 am)
speck-geostationary