On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
I'd like to note that I asked people who were actually affected, and had
examples of their real-world use to step forward and explain their use,
and that I explicitly mentioned that this is something we can easily
re-visit.
But I also note that you did no such thing, neither has anybody else.
The fact is, security people *are* insane. You just argue all the time,
instead fo doing anything productive. So please don't include me in the Cc
on your insane arguments - instead do something productive and I'm
interested.
Ok? That was the whole point of LSM in the first place. I'm *not*
interested in getting roped into your insane arguments. I'm interested in
moving forward and having real examples of real use and code. Until then,
this issue is closed. I thought I had made that clear already, but
apparently not clear enough.
So I repeat: we can undo that commit, but I will damn well not care one
whit about yet another pointless security model flamewar.
Linus
-
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Randy Dunlap | Re: 2.6.25-mm1 (build error: driver core) |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Winkler, Tomas | RE: iwlwifi: fix build bug in "iwlwifi: fix LED stall" |
| Johann Baudy | Packet mmap: TX RING and zero copy |
