Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:

quoted text
> * Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
>> > thanks for doing this.
>> 
>> Yes.  keeping this alive is good.
>> 
>> The practical question is how do we make this change without breaking 
>> the drivers that use their irq argument.
>
> the get_irq_regs() approach worked out really well. We should do a 
> get_irq_nr() and be done with it?

The problem are some drivers today pass in 0 for their irq number
to flag that they are calling the interrupt handler in a polling
mode (not from interrupt context?) so the same logic doesn't quite apply.

Do what you suggest would likely break those drivers.

Eric
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/