Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » October » 19

Re: [PATCH 1/5] Use wake_up_locked() in eventpoll

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@...>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Use wake_up_locked() in eventpoll
Date: Friday, October 19, 2007 - 12:28 pm

On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 08:56:23PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

I haven't tested it, but it's a simple textual substitution:

#define wake_up_locked(x)               __wake_up_locked((x),
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE | TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)

so it should be identical in effect.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/5] TASK_KILLABLE, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 18, 6:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] TASK_KILLABLE, Nick Piggin, (Wed Oct 24, 11:55 pm)
[PATCH 2/5] Use macros instead of TASK_ flags, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 18, 6:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] Use macros instead of TASK_ flags, Nick Piggin, (Wed Oct 24, 11:50 pm)
[PATCH 3/5] Add TASK_WAKEKILL, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 18, 6:26 pm)
[PATCH 4/5] Add lock_page_killable, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 18, 6:26 pm)
[PATCH 5/5] Make wait_on_retry_sync_kiocb killable, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 18, 6:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] Make wait_on_retry_sync_kiocb killable, Nick Piggin, (Wed Oct 24, 11:53 pm)
[PATCH 1/5] Use wake_up_locked() in eventpoll, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 18, 6:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/5] Use wake_up_locked() in eventpoll, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Oct 18, 11:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/5] Use wake_up_locked() in eventpoll, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Oct 19, 12:28 pm)