Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully used by libata

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...>

Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...>

Subject: Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully used by libata

Date: Friday, October 19, 2007 - 8:14 am

Hi Tejun,

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:23:15 +0900
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:

quoted text> > On 26/08/07, Paul Rolland <rol@as2917.net> wrote:
> >> My machine (an ASUS P5W-DH-Deluxe, Core2, 4Go RAM, 3 SATA and 2IDE) is
> >> reporting a :
> >> irq 23: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> >> together with a Call Trace, but :
> >>  - irqpoll is present on the command line,
> >>  - the irq is reported to be used by libata,
> >>  - the irqpoll option is mandatory if I want _some_ of my SATA disks to
> >> be accessible.
> 
> Does this still happen with 2.6.23?  If so, please post boot log.  Thanks.
> 
Not tested yet, will do so during the WE.

Regards,
Paul
-
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully used by..., Paul Rolland, (Sun Aug 26, 2:35 pm)

Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use..., Tejun Heo, (Sat Sep 8, 3:23 am)

Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use..., Paul Rolland, (Sun Sep 9, 2:59 am)

Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use..., Paul Rolland, (Sat Sep 15, 9:38 am)

Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use..., Michal Piotrowski, (Sun Aug 26, 7:37 pm)

Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use..., Tejun Heo, (Thu Oct 18, 11:23 pm)

Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use..., Paul Rolland, (Sun Oct 21, 5:11 am)

Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use..., Paul Rolland, (Fri Oct 19, 8:14 am)

Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use..., Bjoern Olausson, (Fri Oct 19, 9:52 am)


linux-kernel:
Trent Piepho	[PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in\|out)_beXX() asm code
Andi Kleen	[PATCH] [4/50] x86: add cpu codenames for Kconfig.cpu
Andi Kleen	[PATCH] [0/45] x86 2.6.24 patches review I
Stoyan Gaydarov	From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
git:

linux-netdev:
Jarek Poplawski	Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
David Miller	Re: [GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 13/37] dccp: Deprecate Ack Ratio sysctl
Jarek Poplawski	Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
openbsd-misc:

Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully used by libata

Online users