login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
October
»
19
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully used by libata
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Tejun Heo <htejun@...>
To: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...>
Cc: Paul Rolland <rol@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...>
Subject:
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully used by libata
Date: Thursday, October 18, 2007 - 11:23 pm
> On 26/08/07, Paul Rolland <rol@as2917.net> wrote:
quoted text
>> My machine (an ASUS P5W-DH-Deluxe, Core2, 4Go RAM, 3 SATA and 2IDE) is >> reporting a : >> irq 23: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) >> together with a Call Trace, but : >> - irqpoll is present on the command line, >> - the irq is reported to be used by libata, >> - the irqpoll option is mandatory if I want _some_ of my SATA disks to be >> accessible. >> >> I've attached a file with : >> - dmesg, >> - cat /proc/interrupts >> - lspci >> - lspci -vvv >> - my .config >> >> I've tried mounting and accessing all the disks, and it works. >> The last weird thing : though reported as used by libata, the irq 23 counter >> seems to be fixed at 200001, though I've mounted and accessed all the >> disks !
Does this still happen with 2.6.23? If so, please post boot log. Thanks. -- tejun -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully used by...
, Paul Rolland
, (Sun Aug 26, 2:35 pm)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Tejun Heo
, (Sat Sep 8, 3:23 am)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Paul Rolland
, (Sun Sep 9, 2:59 am)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Paul Rolland
, (Sat Sep 15, 9:38 am)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Michal Piotrowski
, (Sun Aug 26, 7:37 pm)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Tejun Heo
, (Thu Oct 18, 11:23 pm)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Paul Rolland
, (Sun Oct 21, 5:11 am)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Paul Rolland
, (Fri Oct 19, 8:14 am)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Bjoern Olausson
, (Fri Oct 19, 9:52 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
James Bottomley
Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers
majkls
sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
Paul Mackerras
Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
KOSAKI Motohiro
[bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin"
git-commits-head
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
3 users
and
1135 guests
online.
Online users
strcmp
johnpresley
zizzazz
Syndicate