On 10/18/2007 10:52 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:They don't -- that's why I asked if you need both scenario's active at the same time. SIGDANGER would just be SIGPLEASEFREEALLYOUCAN with the operator deciding through setting the level at which point applications get it. Or put differently; what's the additional value of notifying an application that the system is about to go balistic when you've already asked it to free all it could earlier? SIGSEEDAMNITITOLDYOUSO? Don't get me wrong; never saw this discussion earlier, may be sensible... Rene. -
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch] |
| jmerkey | [ANNOUNCE] mdb: Merkey's Linux Kernel Debugger 2.6.27-rc4 released |
| Constantine A. Murenin | Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing |
| S K | cpufreq doesn't seem to work in Intel Q9300 |
git: | |
| Eyvind Bernhardsen | Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names |
| Ken Pratt | pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Jon Smirl | ! [rejected] master -> master (non-fast forward) |
| Alex Riesen | Re: How-to combine several separate git repos? |
| Brian | Suggested PF Setup when using BitTorrent? |
| Juan Miscaro | When will OpenBSD support UTF8? |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| xavier brinon | google team and the DIY way of life |
| Mark Lord | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Pavel Emelyanov | [PATCH 1/14][NETNS]: Introduce the net-subsys id generator. |
| Ron Rindjunsky | Re: Linux Wireless Mini-Summit -- Ottawa -- July 22, 2008 |
| jamal | RE: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching |
