login
Header Space

 
 

Re: OOM notifications

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <drepper@...>
Date: Thursday, October 18, 2007 - 5:06 pm

On 10/18/2007 10:52 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:

They don't -- that's why I asked if you need both scenario's active at the 
same time. SIGDANGER would just be SIGPLEASEFREEALLYOUCAN with the operator 
deciding through setting the level at which point applications get it.

Or put differently; what's the additional value of notifying an application 
that the system is about to go balistic when you've already asked it to free
all it could earlier? SIGSEEDAMNITITOLDYOUSO?

Don't get me wrong; never saw this discussion earlier, may be sensible...

Rene.

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
OOM notifications, Marcelo Tosatti, (Thu Oct 18, 4:25 pm)
Re: OOM notifications, Rene Herman, (Thu Oct 18, 4:38 pm)
Re: OOM notifications, Rik van Riel, (Thu Oct 18, 4:52 pm)
Re: OOM notifications, Rene Herman, (Thu Oct 18, 5:06 pm)
Re: OOM notifications, Rik van Riel, (Thu Oct 18, 5:18 pm)
Re: OOM notifications, Rene Herman, (Thu Oct 18, 6:01 pm)
Re: OOM notifications, Rene Herman, (Thu Oct 18, 6:16 pm)
Re: OOM notifications, Ulrich Drepper, (Thu Oct 18, 6:10 pm)
Re: OOM notifications, Pavel Machek, (Fri Oct 19, 6:17 am)
Re: OOM notifications, Chris Friesen, (Fri Oct 19, 1:15 am)
speck-geostationary