Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...>
Cc: Vasily Averin <vvs@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-ext4@...>, <devel@...>
Date: Thursday, October 18, 2007 - 10:17 am

On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:27:00 +1000
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:


How can the VM recognize those pages?  Are they part of
the buffer cache, part of the page cache, or different?

I think it would make sense to at least try to rotate
those pages to the end of the LRU so kswapd can get rid
of them quickly.

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
How Inactive may be much greather than cached?, Vasily Averin, (Thu Oct 18, 2:24 am)
Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached?, Nick Piggin, (Thu Oct 18, 2:27 am)
Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached?, Vasily Averin, (Thu Oct 18, 3:14 am)
Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached?, Nick Piggin, (Thu Oct 18, 3:27 am)
Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached?, Rik van Riel, (Thu Oct 18, 10:17 am)
Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached?, Vasily Averin, (Thu Oct 18, 6:33 am)