Jeff Garzik wrote:
quoted text
> I noticed that 
> sg_tablesize in sata_mv is not LIBATA_MAX_PRD.  This is expected 
> behavior, but I wonder if that difference -- most notably being smaller 
> than SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS -- would trigger any latent bugs.

Another sata_mv difference from the rest: the chip does not support 
ATAPI, so we never care about qc->pad

	Jeff


-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/