Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Nick Piggin
Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 - 11:27 pm

Hi,

On Thursday 18 October 2007 16:24, Vasily Averin wrote:

Buffers, swap cache, and anonymous.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
How Inactive may be much greather than cached?, Vasily Averin, (Wed Oct 17, 11:24 pm)
Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached?, Nick Piggin, (Wed Oct 17, 11:27 pm)
Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached?, Vasily Averin, (Thu Oct 18, 12:14 am)
Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached?, Nick Piggin, (Thu Oct 18, 12:27 am)
Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached?, Vasily Averin, (Thu Oct 18, 3:33 am)
Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached?, Rik van Riel, (Thu Oct 18, 7:17 am)