Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » October » 17

Re: LSM conversion to static interface

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...>
Cc: Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: Re: LSM conversion to static interface
Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 - 10:21 pm

On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Casey Schaufler wrote:

Indeed. I think there is certainly likely to be some small overlap, but I 
*think* they are largely independent issues - "do we want choice in 
securitu models" (a very emphatic YES as far as I'm concerned) vs "do we 
necessarily want to do them as out-of-tree modules" (I'd like people who 
actually *do* things like that to educate us on why and what they are 
doing).

Hmm?

		Linus
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
LSM conversion to static interface, Thomas Fricaccia, (Wed Oct 17, 9:34 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Oct 17, 11:06 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Casey Schaufler, (Wed Oct 17, 10:03 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Oct 17, 10:21 pm)