Hi Linus,
Please pull:
  ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git xen-upstream
This contains updates for arch/x86 paravirt_ops and Xen.
A quick overview of the patchset:
paravirt_ops:

	Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with

	smaller structures of related functions.  Also, clean up the handling

	of lazy mode to make it easier to implement.
x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code
Xen:

	- remove duplicate includes

	- yield if the target vcpu of an IPI is not currently running

	- add post-batch callbacks for multicalls [*]

	- deal with unpinning pagetables when another vcpu still

	  has a cr3 reference [*]

	- deal with split ptelocks by pinning each pte page

	  separately under lock

	- determine the kernel/hypervisor address split dynamically

	- use the right arg structure for register_vcpu_info [*]

	- add extra debugging output for failed multicalls
XFS:

	- eagerly unmap vmapped areas to avoid confict with Xen [*]
[*] bugfix needed for 2.6.23.  I've also cc:d them to stable@kernel.org
Diffstat:

 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c         |    4

 arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets_32.c      |   14

 arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S            |    2

 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_32.c         |  234 ++++++++-----

 arch/x86/kernel/vmi_32.c              |  211 ++++++------

 arch/x86/mm/init_32.c                 |   22 -

 arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c              |  295 +++++++++-------

 arch/x86/xen/mmu.c                    |  149 ++++++--

 arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c             |   52 ++

 arch/x86/xen/multicalls.h             |    5

 arch/x86/xen/smp.c                    |   14

 arch/x86/xen/time.c                   |    6

 arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h                |   10

 drivers/char/hvc_lguest.c             |    2

 drivers/lguest/core.c                 |    6

 drivers/lguest/lguest.c               |  154 ++++----

 drivers/lguest/lguest_bus.c           |    2

 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c            |   13

 include/asm-x86/pa...
[ message continues ]

-

hm, could we do the arch/x86 changes via the arch/x86 tree instead?

We've got about a 100 patches pending there now, under QA, preparing

them for pushout. Will check your paravirt patches too, ok?
	Ingo

-

Yep, that's fine.
    J
-

I just pulled your tree on top of my tip and there are no conflicts. I

checked the diffs and there is nothing, which is conflicting with our

backlogs.
Linus, please go ahead and pull it yourself.
Thanks,
	tglx

-

Heh. I had already done so.
Sometimes I'm tardy and miss things for weeks and need prodding, and

sometimes I pull almost before you've sent the "please pull" message. 
I'm unpredictable. Or keeping you on your toes. Or incompetent. Pick

whatever suits your mood ;)
		Linus

-

Yeah, I'm fixing merge conflicts the third time today :)
      tglx

-