On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
quoted text > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > hm, could we do the arch/x86 changes via the arch/x86 tree instead?
> > We've got about a 100 patches pending there now, under QA, preparing
> > them for pushout. Will check your paravirt patches too, ok?
>
> Yep, that's fine.
I just pulled your tree on top of my tip and there are no conflicts. I
checked the diffs and there is nothing, which is conflicting with our
backlogs.
Linus, please go ahead and pull it yourself.
Thanks,
tglx
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [GIT PULL] paravirt_ops and xen updates for 2.6.24 , Thomas Gleixner , (Wed Oct 17, 4:15 pm)