On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 11:10 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

quoted text
> > >  
> > >  #define read_seqbegin_irqsave(lock, flags)			\
> > > -do {								\
> > > +({								\
> > >  	flags = PICK_SEQ_OP_RET(__read_seqbegin_irqsave_raw,	\
> > >  		__read_seqbegin_irqsave, lock);			\
> > > -} while (0)
> > > +	read_seqbegin(lock);					\
> > > +})
> 
> Yes, definitely the raw and unraw functions should be called
> local_irqsave_raw or something else that makes this obvious to what it
> is doing.

Hmm.. I'm not sure what else to name them .. Since it's in the seqlock.h
I don't think it should be called anything "local_irq*" .. It could be
seq_irqsave_{raw} . 

Daniel

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/