On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:45:17PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 22:34 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:22:43PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > > > > It would be nice to establish a rule to increment the version number > > > immediately after the kernel release and have a suffix to indicate that > > > it's a pre-rc version. "rc0" is my personal favorite. > > > > fwiw, rc0 is also what the Fedora kernel uses for versioning when we're > > shipping pre-rc1 kernels. > > Thanks! I didn't think of the possibility of anyone distributing > precompiled kernels from the "pre-rc" window, but if Fedora does it > (hopefully for beta-testers only), it should be absolutely clear that > it's not just a release with some minor fixes. yeah, this is just in our 'development' pool (also known as 'rawhide') Proper releases only ever get full point releases + -stable as updates. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 05/37] dccp: Cleanup routines for feature negotiation |
| Lennert Buytenhek | [PATCH 16/39] mv643xx_eth: get rid of ETH_/ethernet_/eth_ prefixes |
