On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:55:54AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:th =20 =20 I haven't looked at this code at all, but neither approach feels right to me. How does this work at all? Even if you load a driver later, wouldn't it call usb_set_interface(), which would call usb_create_sysfs_intf_files() and hit the same issue? Heck, why do both call usb_create_sysfs_intf_file()? I would guess if you're *changing* the active configuration you would need to do that, but why in usb_set_interface() at all? Matt --=20 Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.= net=20 Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver I say, what are all those naked people doing? -- Big client to Stef User Friendly, 12/14/1997
| Linus Torvalds | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
| Ingo Molnar | [patch 03/13] syslets: generic kernel bits |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gregory Haskins | [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
