* Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:

quoted text
> Two comments:
> 
> 1) we have a vague definition of "RX work processed."  Due to error 
> conditions and goto's in that function, rx_processed_cnt may or may 
> not equal the number of packets actually processed.
> 
> 2) man I dislike these inline C statement combinations (ranting at 
> original code style, not you).  I would much rather waste a few extra 
> lines of source code and make the conditions obvious:
> 
> 	while (... && (rx_processed_cnt < limit)) {
> 		rx_processed_cnt++;
> 
> 		...
> 	}
> 
> or even
> 
> 	while (1) {
> 		...
> 		if (rx_processed_cnt == limit)
> 			break;
> 		rx_processed_cnt++;
> 	}
> 
> The compiler certainly doesn't care, and IMO it prevents bugs.

agreed. Do you have an uptodate patch/git-URI for the forcedeth rewrite 
you did? I can throw it into the testbed.

	Ingo
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/