Re: [PATCH] RT: fix spin_trylock_irq

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Daniel Walker
Date: Monday, October 15, 2007 - 1:06 pm

On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 14:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:


In hindsight I should have resent, but I didn't .. Really it's a matter
of frustration on my part. Where I submit patches that should be
included , but they are ignored for no clear reason .. Then I submit
again, and the patches are ignored again for no clear reason..

Comparing mainline and -rt isn't very interesting since , -rt has few
patches sent in against it .. Andrew is bound to loose a patch here and
there on accident, but -rt has so few patches sent in that we shouldn't
be loosing any.


That's a git tree tho , so apples and oranges ..


In all fairness you asked for links to patches, and that's is what I
gave you ..


Not sure what your getting at.. I specifically directed you to a patch.
I don't think that means you had to look for it, all you have to do was
include it ..

Daniel

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] RT: fix spin_trylock_irq, Sébastien Dugué, (Thu Oct 11, 5:24 am)
Re: [PATCH] RT: fix spin_trylock_irq, Steven Rostedt, (Thu Oct 11, 7:49 am)
Re: [PATCH] RT: fix spin_trylock_irq, Daniel Walker, (Mon Oct 15, 10:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] RT: fix spin_trylock_irq, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Oct 15, 11:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] RT: fix spin_trylock_irq, Daniel Walker, (Mon Oct 15, 1:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH] RT: fix spin_trylock_irq, Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Oct 15, 2:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH] RT: fix spin_trylock_irq, Daniel Walker, (Mon Oct 15, 2:44 pm)