Re: [PATCH 2/7] RT: Wrap the RQ notion of priority to make it conditional

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Gregory Haskins
Date: Monday, October 15, 2007 - 12:57 pm

On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 13:45 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

Ok.  Keep in mind the spirit of the patch was to wrap the setting so we
didn't need more #ifdefs later, not so much to make that define.  I can
clean up the ifdef of ifdef part no problem.  I was just trying to keep
it one place to make the inevitable future change to share with non
PREEMPT_RT easier ;)



-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/7] RT: RT-Overload/Sched enhancements (v2), Gregory Haskins, (Fri Oct 12, 5:15 pm)
[PATCH 1/7] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Oct 12, 5:15 pm)
[PATCH 3/7] RT: Initialize the priority value, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Oct 12, 5:15 pm)
[PATCH 6/7] RT: Select tasks based on relative affinity, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Oct 12, 5:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/7] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Oct 15, 10:42 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/7] RT: Initialize the priority value, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Oct 15, 10:46 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/7] RT: Wrap the RQ notion of priority to make ..., Gregory Haskins, (Mon Oct 15, 12:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/7] RT: Select tasks based on relative affinity, Gregory Haskins, (Mon Oct 15, 1:08 pm)