Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <jens.axboe@...>, <mingo@...>
Date: Monday, October 15, 2007 - 2:47 pm

On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:46:47 -0700
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:


Seems a pretty fundamental change which could do with some careful
benchmarking, methinks.

See, your patch amounts to "do more seeks to improve one test case". 
Surely other testcases will worsen.  What are they?


Might be worth a code comment?
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Oct 15, 1:46 pm)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority, Andrew Morton, (Mon Oct 15, 2:47 pm)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority, Andrew Morton, (Mon Oct 15, 5:12 pm)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority, Andrew Morton, (Mon Oct 22, 5:23 am)
Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority, Andrew Morton, (Mon Oct 22, 5:49 am)