Re: [PATCH 2/7] RT: Wrap the RQ notion of priority to make it conditional

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, RT <linux-rt-users@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
Date: Monday, October 15, 2007 - 1:45 pm

--

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Gregory Haskins wrote:


NACK


Yes, I do want it conditional. But only because we want to test it first,
so the condition is really temporary. I agree with Peter that this should
be for non PREEMPT_RT as well, and I'll work on a patch for upstream.

But these defines setting defines is just ugly.

-- Steve


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/7] RT: RT-Overload/Sched enhancements (v2), Gregory Haskins, (Fri Oct 12, 8:15 pm)
[PATCH 6/7] RT: Select tasks based on relative affinity, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Oct 12, 8:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/7] RT: Select tasks based on relative affinity, Gregory Haskins, (Mon Oct 15, 4:08 pm)
[PATCH 3/7] RT: Initialize the priority value, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Oct 12, 8:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/7] RT: Initialize the priority value, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Oct 15, 1:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/7] RT: Wrap the RQ notion of priority to make i..., Steven Rostedt, (Mon Oct 15, 1:45 pm)
[PATCH 1/7] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Oct 12, 8:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/7] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Oct 15, 1:42 pm)