Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Mike Galbraith <efault@...>, Lennart Poettering <mztabzr@...>
Date: Monday, October 15, 2007 - 9:57 am

On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 15:26 +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
+
r

Because SCHED_FIFO is easier, _RR is for later. It was mostly an RFC to
request behavioural wishes from the users.

ued)
ota,"
d_nr(p));

Right, that is where I copied from, I'll pull the functionality into a
single function and make this and the sysrq stuff use it.

Thanks!
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Oct 12, 4:51 pm)
[RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 6:51 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Kay Sievers, (Mon Oct 15, 5:32 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Lennart Poettering, (Mon Oct 15, 10:25 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Dmitry Adamushko, (Mon Oct 15, 9:26 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Oct 15, 9:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 13, 3:18 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 4:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 5:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 7:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Oct 14, 2:34 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 7:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 13, 6:11 am)