Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Mike Galbraith <efault@...>, Lennart Poettering <mztabzr@...>
Date: Monday, October 15, 2007 - 9:26 am

On 14/10/2007, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

Why only SHCED_FIFO and not SCHED_RR?
Their (mis)behavior is similar wrt SCHED_NORMAL tasks.



I guess, put_prev_task() / set_curr_task() should be called (for the
case of task_running(p)) to make it group-scheduler-friendly (as it's
done e.g. in sched_setscheduler()).

(normilize_task() should probably do the same)


-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Oct 12, 4:51 pm)
[RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 6:51 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Kay Sievers, (Mon Oct 15, 5:32 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Lennart Poettering, (Mon Oct 15, 10:25 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Dmitry Adamushko, (Mon Oct 15, 9:26 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Oct 15, 9:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 13, 3:18 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 4:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 5:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 7:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Oct 14, 2:34 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 7:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 13, 6:11 am)