On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:06:19 +1000 Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

quoted text
> On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
> > unmaintained, so decided to sent the patch to you :-).
> > I have CCed Ted, who did work on the code in the 90s. I found no current
> > email address of Chad Page.
> 
> This really needs to be fixed...

rd.c is fairly mind-boggling vfs abuse.

quoted text
> I can't make up my mind between the approaches to fixing it.
> 
> On one hand, I would actually prefer to really mark the buffers
> dirty (as in: Eric's fix for this problem[*]) than this patch,
> and this seems a bit like a bandaid...
> 
> On the other hand, the wound being covered by the bandaid is
> actually the code in the buffer layer that does this latent
> "cleaning" of the page because it sadly doesn't really keep
> track of the pagecache state. But it *still* feels like we
> should be marking the rd page's buffers dirty which should
> avoid this problem anyway.
> 
> [*] However, hmm, with Eric's patch I guess we'd still have a hole
> where filesystems that write their buffers by hand think they are
> "cleaning" these things and we're back to square one. That could
> be fixed by marking the buffers dirty again?
> 
> Why were Eric's patches dropped, BTW? I don't remember.

runtime problems, iirc.
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/